15 October, 3pm (BST)
UPcoming Talk
The full paper is here.
Maria Teleki is a PhD student in Computer Science at Texas A&M University. More details here.
Speaker: Maria Teleki
The Due Process Deficit: Auditing AI Governance in U.S. Higher Education
Previous Speakers
Browse the series as a set of speaker cards. Open each one to reveal the talk summary, date, and viewing link.
Yulu Pi
Date: 19 May, 3pm (BST)
Speaker: Yulu Pi
Talk: Push and Pushback in Contesting AI: Demands for and Resistance to Accountability
AI systems can fail critically, cause harm, and spark public controversy. In response, affected individuals, advocacy groups, and professional collectives are increasingly contesting these technologies to demand accountability and change. Yet institutions often deploy sophisticated tactics to resist such contestation. This talk maps how these push-and-pull dynamics unfold. I will walk through six common tactics: denying responsibility; denying or downplaying harm; blocking contestation; justifying the algorithm; avoiding scrutiny through opacity; and strategic concession and delay. Understanding these resistance tactics is crucial for advocates and policymakers seeking meaningful AI accountability. The talk offers actionable insights for anticipating institutional pushback and designing more effective contestation strategies.
Yulu Pi is a postdoctoral research associate at the Trustworthy Data Science and Security group at the University of Duisburg-Essen. Her research sits at the intersection of technology, society, and governance, examining how people’s behaviours change in relation to digital systems. She draws on HCI methods to inform AI governance frameworks.
For the speaker + slides, see here
Passcode: 3eFj3H*k
Azer Kilic
Date: 25 March, 3pm (GMT)
Speaker: Azer Kilic
Talk: Interpretive contests over the future of work amid AI advances: Examples from the Turkish translation industry
This talk examines interpretive contests over the future of work amid advances in artificial intelligence (AI), focusing on professional translators’ imaginaries in the context of machine translation. It argues that individual concerns and expectations surrounding future AI-driven automation reflect competing interpretations of contemporary political-economic and institutional settings. The talk draws on interviews with forty translators from Turkey, a country with the highest perception of technological risks within the OECD, and identifies three major approaches in narratives about the future of work: fears about personal, occupational, and societal impacts of workplace automation underlining the profit-oriented logic of capitalism; hopes regarding personal professional futures emphasizing meritocracy in a competitive market setting; and desires for alternative societal futures including visions of different work regimes. Together, these diverse imaginaries highlight ongoing interpretive contests over the meaning of technological change and the future of work under capitalism.
Regine Paul and Vali Stan
Date: 21 January 2026, 3pm (GMT)
Speakers: Regine Paul and Vali Stan
Talk: The AI Matrix: Profits, Politics, and the Struggle Over Our Tech Future
AI is often presented in extremes, either as a revolutionary technology boosting prosperity for everyone, or as a juggernaut that threatens jobs, democracy, or even human life. This talk cuts through those narratives by asking a simpler question: who really benefits from AI, and who has the power to shape how it is made and used? Drawing on a critical political economy perspective, we argue that today’s AI boom is not simply about clever machines taking over, but about profit imperatives and political choices. AI technologies are developed and deployed within pre-existing economic structures, largely reinforcing inequalities between industries, workers, and countries rather than transforming them away.
Acknowledgement of this distinct socio-economic embedding of a hyped technology informs our search for forms of resistance. Contrary to the techno-determinist idea that the spread of AI is inevitable, and based on our recent co-authored book “The AI Matrix”, we present growing efforts to push back against the harmful and extractive uses of such technologies. These include workers challenging algorithmic surveillance and automation efforts, activists exposing the socio-ecological costs hidden in AI value chains, whistleblowers publicising biased systems and opaque business decisions, but also technicians experimenting with alternative, more public-interest-driven and less extractive forms of AI. Together, these emerging critical engagements with mainstream big tech show that AI futures remain contested and ultimately open. Whether current tech developments deepen global inequalities or support fairer and more democratic societies therefore depends less on the technology itself than on the collective decisions we make about the role of AI in our economies and societies.
Tom Williams
Date: 22 April, 3pm (BST)
Speaker: Tom Williams
Talk: Degrees of Freedom: On Robotics and Social Justice
In Degrees of Freedom, Tom Williams explores critical questions at the intersection of robotics and social justice. He considers the ways in which roboticists design their robots’ appearance, how robots think and act, how robots perceive people, and the domains into which robots are deployed. The book highlights not only the ways roboticists tend to reinforce white patriarchal power structures but also how roboticists might instead subvert those power structures by applying theories and methods from a diverse range of fields. Drawing on computer science; history and politics; law, criminology, and sociology; feminist, ethnic, and Black studies; literary and media studies; and social, moral, and cognitive psychology, the book connects questions of robot design with larger abolitionist movements by presenting a vision for a more socially just future of robotics.
Andrea Medrado
Date: 18 February, 3pm (GMT)
Speaker: Andrea Medrado
Talk: Favel IA: AI, Participatory Action Research (PAR), and the Question of Empathy
This talk presents preliminary findings from the project Favel IA, which was co-designed with the Papo Reto Institute (IPR), a favela media activist and human rights organisation based in Rio de Janeiro. The project analyses a core question developed jointly with IPR: How does the favela use AI as opposed to how AI uses the favela in extractive ways? Drawing from critical and decolonial data and AI studies (Valente and Grohmann, 20024; Goodlad, 2023; Ricaurte, 2019), Favel IA interrogates the politics of empathy as a form of solidarity. It is also attentive to the gendered, raced, classed, and transnational geopolitical dimensions that shape who is permitted to perform empathy and who is positioned as its beneficiary. These dynamics contrast sharply with the everyday invisible forms of political empathy exercised by favela communities, which are rarely recognised or valued.
Cathy Rogers
Date: November 19th 2025, 3pm
Speaker: Cathy Rogers
Talk: AI is on the march. Is the AI safety movement ready?
This was the first of a series of monthly talk hosted by the new Contentious Politics of AI network. The new report maps the emerging AI safety movement and finds critical gaps in grassroots mobilisation and public voice.
The Social Change Lab report on AI is on the March. Is the AI Safety Movement Ready?
Next steps
Suggest a Talk
Have an idea for a future session or want to collaborate on the series? We’d be glad to hear from you.
